Rhizomatic-Topological Analysis of Image in Relation to Desire-Machines in Terrence Malick's Cinema: Case Studies of Badlands (1973) and To the Wonder (2012) through the Lens of Deleuze and Guattari

Authors

  • Saman Sadr Eshkevari * Department, Kamal-ol-Molk Institute of Higher Education, Nowshahr, Iran https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0450-4850
  • Faraz Fallahnezhad Department of Performing and Visual Arts, Kamal-ol-Molk Institute of Higher Education, Nowshahr, Iran
  • Mehdi Khabbazi Kenari Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babol, Iran

https://doi.org/10.48313/pab.v3i1.47

Abstract

This paper examines the pictorial and narrative structures of Terrence Malick’s Badlands and To the Wonder through the philosophical frameworks of rhizome, topology, and desire-machines developed by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari. It argues that by breaking away from classical narrative structures and causal logic, Malick's cinema generates images not as representations of events or meanings but as productive configurations of desire and becoming. Within this framework, images function rhizomatically, forming non-hierarchical and multi-directional networks, while cinematic space is conceived as a topological surface shaped by intensities, folds, and transformations rather than fixed coordinates. The central problem addressed in this study concerns how the rhizomatic structure of the image, in relation to desire machines, can generate a visual continuum suitable for topological analysis. Three hypotheses are proposed: 1) Malick’s films move toward a desire-driven and rhizomatic form; 2) the image operates as a productive act connected to desubjectified and multi-axial perception rather than as a representational unit; and 3) cinematic space in these works assumes a topological quality, where form emerges through dynamic surfaces and affective densities. The research employs a qualitative, descriptive, and analytical methodology, drawing on theoretical literature and close formal analysis of five selected sequences from each film. The findings suggest that Malick constructs a world of wandering, fragmentation, and affective motion—one in which meaning is displaced, subjectivity is decentered, and perception is diversified across heterogeneous visual and auditory planes. The films generate a visual continuum driven by desire, operating as machinic assemblages that connect disparate geographies and sensory elements. Ultimately, this research offers a novel model for film analysis based on rhizomatic and topological thought, expanding the critical vocabulary available for understanding contemporary cinematic form beyond the limits of representation.                  

Keywords:

Terrence Malick, Deleuze and Guattari, Topology, Rhizome, Desire-machines

References

  1. [1] Beugnet, M. (2011). Cinema and sensation: French film and the art of transgression. Southern illinois university press. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Cinema_and_Sensation/T3VdU4IqEJYC?hl=en&gbpv=0

  2. [2] Plantinga, C. (2009). Moving viewers: American film and the spectator’s experience. Moving viewers: American film and the spectator’s experience. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Moving_Viewers/wjyFDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0

  3. [3] Barnett, C. B., & Elliston, C. J. (2016). Theology and the films of terrence malick. New York: Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781315743158&type=googlepdf

  4. [4] Goodchild, P. (1996). Deleuze and Guattari: An introduction to the politics of desire. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=5017443&publisher=FZ7200

  5. [5] Deleuze, G. (1997). Cinema 1, the movement-image. University of Minnesota Press. https://monoskop.org/images/8/80/Deleuze_Gilles_Cinema_1_Movement-Image.pdf

  6. [6] Deleuze, G. (1993). The fold leibniz and the baroque. University of Minnesota Press. https://www.upress.umn.edu/9780816616015/the-fold/

  7. [7] Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. Columbia University Press. https://dokumen.pub/difference-and-repetition-revised-0231081588-9780231081580.html

  8. [8] Grosz, E. (2008). Chaos, Territory, Art. Columbia University Press. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Chaos_Territory_Art/OWd-Q8a2n2UC?hl=en&gbpv=0

  9. [9] Corrigan, T. (2010). The essay film as a cinema of ideas. New York: Columbia University Press. https://bpb-ap-se2.wpmucdn.com/mediafactory.org.au/dist/c/679/files/2016/07/EssayFilmCorrigan-1c0d1g7.pdf

  10. [10] Pisters, P. (2012). The neuro-image: A deleuzian film-philosophy of digital screen culture. Stanford University Press. https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Neuro_Image/A9A1kaZgcGgC?hl=en&gbpv=0

  11. [11] Massumi, B. (1992). A user’s guide to capitalism and schizophrenia: Deviations from deleuze and guattari. MIT press. https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Neuro_Image/A9A1kaZgcGgC?hl=en&gbpv=0

  12. [12] Flaxman, G. (2000). The brain is the screen: Deleuze and the philosophy of cinema. U of Minnesota Press. https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Brain_is_the_Screen/91saYRMXYQYC?hl=en&gbpv=0

  13. [13] Walsh, M. (2015). Patricia Pisters (2012) The neuro-image: A Deleuzian film-philosophy of digital screen culture. Film-philosophy, 19(1), 51-54. https://doi.org/10.3366/film.2015.0032

  14. [14] Colebrook, C. (2020). Understanding deleuze. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003118312

  15. [15] Bogue, R. (2003). Deleuze on cinema. London: Routledge Press. https://www.routledge.com/Deleuze-on-Cinema/Bogue/p/book/9780415966047

  16. [16] Deleuze, G., Guattari, F., & Massumi, B. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia: Gilles Deleuze, Félix Guattari; translation and foreword by Brian Massumi. University of Minnesota Press. https://www.routledge.com/Deleuze-on-Cinema/Bogue/p/book/9780415966047

  17. [17] Deleuze, G. (1998). Essays critical and clinical. Verso. https://books.google.com/books?id=04KsxqTAGDYC

Published

2026-01-06

How to Cite

Sadr Eshkevari, S. ., Fallahnezhad, F. ., & Khabbazi Kenari, M. . (2026). Rhizomatic-Topological Analysis of Image in Relation to Desire-Machines in Terrence Malick’s Cinema: Case Studies of Badlands (1973) and To the Wonder (2012) through the Lens of Deleuze and Guattari. Perspectives on Art and Beyond, 3(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.48313/pab.v3i1.47